Search Results for "employees' pension scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "employees' pension scheme"

532 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 532 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Industrial Disputes Act and Pension Fund Rules. Employee's Claim for Pension Failed Due to Insufficient Service and Voluntary Abandonment, Not Voluntary Retirement, Under Rule 22 of State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules, 1955.

8 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from the appellant's claim for pensionary benefits after his service with the respondent bank ended. The appellant was appointed as ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Pension Benefits Case Under Regularisation Rules. Employee Not Entitled to Old Pension Scheme as Initial Appointment Was on Contract Basis and Regularisation Was Prospective Under Rule 6 of Regularisation Rules, 2011.

28 Feb 2023

The dispute centered on the entitlement of an employee to pensionary benefits under the old pension scheme following the regularisation of his service...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employer in Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Dispute Over Application Date. The Court set aside the Delhi High Court's direction to apply the MACP scheme from 01-01-2006, holding that the scheme's effective date of 01-09-2008 under the office memorandum dated 19-05-2009 was valid, and employees not completing 24 years of service by that date were not entitled to benefits under the superseded ACP scheme.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the applicability date of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) introduced b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Project Employees for Pensionary Benefits — Past Service Under Adult Education Project Counted for Pension Under Rule 59 of Bihar Pension Rules. The Court held that the circular dated 12th August 1969 declaring temporary service of more than 15 years as pensionable applies to employees absorbed from the project, overriding clauses that treated absorption as new appointment.

31 Jan 2020

The appeals arose from a Full Bench judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which held that employees of the Adult Education and Non-Formal Education Pro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of DTC Employee Seeking Pension for Lack of Minimum Qualifying Service. Leave Without Pay Period Excluded from Pensionable Service Under Rule 21 of Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972.

22 Oct 2019

The appellant, Karan Singh, was a conductor with the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC). He was appointed as a monthly rate conductor w.e.f. 27th Novem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Pension Dispute with Institute Employees — State Not Liable for Pension Payments Under Institute's Self-Funded Scheme. Board Resolution Explicitly Stated No Separate Grant Would Be Sought from Government for Retirement Benefits.

30 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a dispute between the State of Bihar and employees of the Anugraha Narayan Sinha Institute of Social Studies, Patna, re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Retired Professor in WRIC Case — University and UGC Directed to Pay Pension Under University Pension Scheme. The court held that the petitioner, a former director of WRIC, was entitled to pension benefits as WRIC was a constituent unit of the University of Mumbai, which had adopted a pension scheme.

20 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Dr. Arvind Vishnu Patankar, a Ph.D. in Solid State Physics, joined Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR) as a Research Assista...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Claim for Family Pension Despite Non-Communication of Nomination Change — Municipal Corporation Directed to Grant Family Pension with Interest from Date of Husband's Death. The Court held that nomination is only for payment purposes and does not create a vested right; the widow as legal heir is entitled to family pension under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

3 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Smt. Vanita Shankar Agawane, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of the ord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Retired Teacher Seeking Pension Benefits in Kendriya Vidyalaya Pension Case Due to Cut-off Date. Cut-off Date of 1st January, 1986 for Pension Eligibility Upheld as Reasonable Classification Under Article 14.

4 May 2006

The petitioner, Sindhu Vishwanath Phadake, joined service as a teacher in Adarsh Vidya Bhavan School on 1st November, 1957 and worked until 24th June,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Apprentice Teachers in Zilla Parishad Schools. Apprentice teachers appointed under the Apprentices Act, 1961 are not entitled to regularization or absorption as they are not employees under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 50 individuals, were appointed as apprentice teachers in Zilla Parishad schools under the Apprentices Act, 1961, for a period of one ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)