Search Results for "drugs and cosmetics"

139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Incriminating Evidence. Court held that non-compliance with Section 52A of NDPS Act and absence of contraband recovery from accused Nos. 4, 5, and 6 entitled them to bail.

The Bombay High Court heard four bail applications arising from the same crime under the NDPS Act. The applicants were accused of involvement in a dru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Pharmaceutical Firm in Drug Misbranding Case Due to Procedural Lapses in Sampling and Testing. Conviction under Section 27(b)(ii) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 set aside as prosecution failed to prove compliance with mandatory sampling and testing procedures.

The petitioners, M/s. Padma Pharmaceuticals and its partner Arun Kumar C. Patil, were convicted under Section 27(b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Re-testing of Narcotic Samples in NDPS Case. Court Holds That Sending Reserved Sample to CFSL Does Not Prejudice Accused's Right to Fair Trial Under NDPS Act.

The applicant, Michael Onyeka Jude, challenged an order dated 10.07.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge for NDPS at Mumbai, which allowed the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Drugs Case Due to Procedural Lapse — Failure to Timely Invoke Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act Renders CDL Report Inadmissible, but State Did Not Challenge on That Ground.

The State of Goa filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents (M/s Caryl Pharma, its proprietor G.P. Pillai, M/s Ce-Chem Pharmaceuticals, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prosecution in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case Due to Limitation Bar. Complaint filed beyond three-year limitation period under Section 468(2)(c) Cr.P.C. for offence under Section 27(d) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

The petitioners, M/s Modern Laboratories and its partner Arun Kumar Kharia, were accused in CC No.68/2012 on the file of the III Addl. Chief Judicial ...