Search Results for "detaining authority"

782 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 782 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Invalid as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Detenu's Bail Status in Pending Criminal Cases.

The petitioner, Kiran Dhanraj Kharat, challenged a detention order dated 13 December 2017 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution. The Court Held That a 19-Day Gap Between Passing and Service of Detention Order Without Explanation Violates the Detenu's Right to Make a Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vishnu @ Bablu Vasant Gawali, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Material. Detenu's Dismissal from CISF for Alleged Smuggling Involvement Not Considered, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Avatar Meena, father-in-law of the detenu Muralilal Meena, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 August 2013 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders for Lack of Proximity Between Alleged Acts and Public Order. Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 fails as alleged criminal acts do not affect public order but merely law and order.

The case involves three criminal writ petitions filed by Sayyed Muddasir Hussain and Sayyed Izaj Hussain challenging their preventive detention orders...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Detenu's Statement Under Section 108 of Customs Act Not Considered, Violating Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Vashdev Gobindram Adnani, challenged the detention order dated 3-11-2004 passed by the Principal Secretary to the Go...