Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Refers Writ Petition to Larger Bench Due to Conflict on MRTP Act Reservation Lapsing. Dispute Involves Whether Notice Under Section 127 Served Before Plan Revision Lapses Upon Finalisation of Revised Development Plan Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by an agriculturist challenging the reservation of his land for a primary school under the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Lapsed as Compensation Was Deposited with Collector But Not Paid to Landowners, Failing Statutory Requirement.

The Supreme Court disposed of a bunch of appeals involving common questions of law and fact regarding land acquisition proceedings. The background inv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Challenge to Land Acquisition Award Under MRTP Act; Section 24(2) of New Land Acquisition Act Held Inapplicable. Acquisition Proceeding Saved by Section 114 of 2013 Act and Section 6 of General Clauses Act, Compensation Determined per Section 24(1)(a).

The petitioner, owner of land admeasuring 9 Gunthas of City Survey No. 3328 at Bhosari, challenged an acquisition award under the Maharashtra Regional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Inaction of Planning Authority. Reservation Lapses When Planning Authority Fails to Take Steps for Acquisition Within Six Months of Notice Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Motilal Hirakhanwala, owned lands bearing Survey No. 386 (2.78 H) and Survey No. 389 (1.23 H) within the limits of Jalna Mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lack of Title. Petitioners failed to prove ownership of the acquired land, and the acquisition was for a public purpose under the MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain lands in Kolhapur, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for road widening...