Search Results for "debt adjustment"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Facilitates Settlement in Consumer Dispute Involving Flat Buyers, Builder, and Bank Under Consumer Protection Act. Court Records Amicable Resolution Terms Including Waiver of Charges, Interest Discounts, and Payment Adjustments, Directing Compliance with Timelines.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against a common judgment of the National Consumer Dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Union Bank of India in SARFAESI Act Matter — Endorsement Declining One-Time Settlement Not a 'Decision' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Endorsement Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Before DRT.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Union Bank of India (appellants) against an order dated 02.05.2023 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Bank's Appeal Against Single Judge Order in Writ Petition Challenging Endorsement Under SARFAESI Act. Writ Petition Challenging Endorsement Under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 17.

The appellants, Union Bank of India and its Chief Manager, filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Commissioner's Order Under Section 33C(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Recovery Certificate for Backwages Upheld Despite Bank's Claim of Limitation and Set-Off

The petitioner, The Goa Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/03/2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation of Monarch Research and Brokerage Private Limited and Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited with Networth Stock Broking Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 — Objection by Gold Castle Realtor Dismissed as Not a Creditor or Member.

The judgment concerns two Company Scheme Petitions (CSP 575/2012 and CSP 576/2012) filed by Monarch Project and Finmarkets Limited (2nd Transferor Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Sundeep Polymers Due to Bona Fide Dispute Over Hire Purchase Agreement. Dispute Regarding Defective Vehicle and Pending Consumer Complaint Constitutes Substantial Grounds, Not a Mere Debt Acknowledgment.

The petitioning-creditor, Tata Motors Ltd (formerly Tata Finance Ltd), filed a winding-up petition under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Makes Conditional Winding Up Order in Contract Dispute Over Endorsements. Interpretation of contract endorsements determines existence of debt under Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Reliance Broadcast Network Limited, filed a winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, Raj Oil Mills Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Deduction from Gratuity for Cooperative Loan Repayment. Employer Cannot Deduct Gratuity for Loan to Cooperative Society Unless It Is a Government Due Under Rule 132 read with Rule 134 of Maharashtra Civil Service (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The appellant, Ashfaq Husain, was a Section Officer with Zilla Parishad, Washim. Upon his retirement, the respondents (Chief Executive Officer, Block ...