Search Results for "contract modification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "contract modification"

512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Condition in Food Kit Supply RFP for Gauri Ganpati Festival — Condition Held Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Pre-qualification criterion requiring experience of providing 300 labourers in 70 government locations with Rs. 25 crore work order found to be irrational and tailored to exclude eligible bidders.

5 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenged a pre-qualification condition (PQ5) in a Request...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

4 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Power Solutions Company and Electricity Supply Company. Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allowed due to failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator as per clause 4.1 of contract agreement dated 28.03.2018.

21 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s Nsure Reliable Power Solutions Pvt Ltd, a private limited company engaged in infrastructure business, participated in a tender flo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Family MoU Binding on Shareholders. The court held that a family Memorandum of Understanding containing an arbitration clause constitutes a valid arbitration agreement, enforceable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and binding on heirs and successors.

6 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Delhi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

5 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Unascertained Damages Claim — Lock-in Period License Fee Not a Debt Under Companies Act, 1956. Claim for balance license fee after premature vacation is a claim for damages requiring adjudication, not a debt due and payable under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

28 Feb 2014

The petitioning-creditor, Indiabulls Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, against ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Price Revision Upheld as Valid Modification. Letter dated 28 June 1999 held to have modified the terms of the Purchase Order, allowing recoveries and adjustments per letter dated 31 October 2000.

13 Dec 2012

The petitioner, M/s. JCL International Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., on 1 May 1999 for the sup...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Seeking Modification of Interest Award — Arbitral Tribunal's Discretion on Interest Rate and Period Not Interfered With

24 Sep 2012

The Petitioner, IMC Limited (formerly United Storage & Tank Terminals Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Upholds Award of Refund and Damages for Breach of Contract. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the award of damages beyond contractual refund was justified.

30 Jun 2011

The Union of India, acting through the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager of Western Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbit...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)