Search Results for "consumer dispute"

103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Bail Order in Murder Case Due to Lack of Reasoning. Bail granted under Section 439 CrPC quashed as order was cryptic and failed to consider gravity of offence under Section 302 IPC, with matter remanded for fresh decision.

The appeal was preferred by the informant-appellant, the son of the deceased, challenging the High Court of Rajasthan's order dated 7th May 2020 grant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Housing Board Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Cancellation of Registration — Limitation Bar Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Applied. The Court held that the consumer complaint filed 11 years after cancellation was time-barred and the allottee was in default.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Rajasthan Housing Board against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Hospital's Appeal Against NCDRC Order Exonerating Insurer in Medical Negligence Case. Insurance Policies Taken by Doctors Cannot Be Used to Fasten Liability on Insurer for Hospital's Own Negligence.

The appellant, M/s Sheth M L Vaduwala Eye Hospital, a charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1961, conducted an eye camp betwe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order Compelling Amendment of Consumer Complaint in Insurance Claim Dispute. Complainant is Dominus Litis and Cannot Be Forced to Amend Pleadings.

The appellant, M/s Acme Cleantech Solutions Private Limited, filed a consumer complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Award in Medical Negligence Case Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court found deficiency in service due to inadequate post-operative monitoring and delayed intervention in treating a patient with aortic aneurysm, leading to death and warranting compensation.

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by the legal heirs of a deceased patient, Dinesh Jaiswal, against Bombay Hospital & Medical Research Centre a...