Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

390 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Son's Challenge Against Impleadment of Parents in Property Suit — Order Directing Addition of Parents as Parties Set Aside. Court holds that parents have no independent right to be impleaded in son's suit for possession against third parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Parag Prakash Mutha, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 10 January 2022 passed by the 7th Additional Judge, Small Causes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Manager for Misconduct in Loan Sanctions. Disciplinary Proceedings Valid as Charges of Failing to Exercise Due Diligence and Integrity in Sanctioning Loans Were Established, and Penalty Not Disproportionate.

The petitioner, R.M. Yadav, was a Branch Manager at Bank of India's Agardanda branch. In 2003, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Stamp Duty and Penalty on Unregistered Agreement of Sale in Specific Performance Suit. Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Application Under Section 37 Read with Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Abdul Majeed, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Premature Retirement Order Set Aside as Review Committee Failed to Consider Entire Service Record and Adverse Remarks Were Not Communicated.

The Petitioner, a District Judge, challenged his compulsory retirement from service on attaining the age of 55 years, by an order dated 12/07/2018. He...