Search Results for "bootleggers"

316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Recital of Grounds. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Relevant Material Not Considered.

The petitioner, Rupesh Laxman Gaikwad, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending bail application, vitiating subjective satisfaction under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Sameer @ Panna Mehboob Shaikh, a detenu, challenged a detention order dated 13th December 2024 issued by the Commissioner of Police, P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Reliance on Extraneous Material. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Properly Consider Relevant Material and Included Cases Where Petitioner Was Acquitted or Granted Bail.

The petitioner, Mohammad Sidhik Mohammad Kausar, challenged a detention order dated 30.09.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalna under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Placement of Full Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. Failure to Furnish Complete Bail Order Violates Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Vikram @ Bala Shahaji Sonavane, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 18/7/2024 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Than...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Reconsideration of Previously Adjudicated Offences and Failure to Distinguish Public Order from Law and Order Invalidates Preventive Detention.

The petitioner, Rajesh @ Dadu Eknath Nikumbh (Dhobi), challenged a preventive detention order dated 14.03.2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Jalg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows State's Appeal Against Quashing of Detention Order. High Court's Interpretation of Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 Regarding Detention Period is Erroneous.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the High Court's order quashing a preventive detention order under the Maharasht...