Search Results for "acquisition steps"

825 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 825 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within 10 Years. Petitioners' land reserved for school purposes not acquired despite notice; court declares reservation lapsed and directs publication of notification.

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gat No. 105/2+3 at Village Bale, Solapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Blue Zone Classification Not Proved by State. Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Awards for Similar Lands Acquired for Same Purpose Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to the acquisition of land owned by the appellant, Kazi Akiloddin, for the construction of a flood protection wall in Akola, Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Reservation on Land Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to initiate acquisition proceedings within ten years from sanction of development plan results in lapsing of reservation under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Saurabh R. Shah, owned land at Survey No.198, Hissa No.3/2, village Sandor, Vasai, Palghar, which was reserved for water bodies/20 met...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Land reserved for Elevated Service Reservoir declared lapsed as Planning Authority failed to acquire or take proceedings within statutory period under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Jawahar Hiralal Mehta, through his power of attorney holder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Judgment on Interpretation of Section 24 Proviso in Land Acquisition Act. The proviso to Section 24 of the 2013 Act governs Section 24(2), not Section 24(1)(b), as held in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals challenging the Division Bench judgment in Delhi Metro Rail Corporation v. Tarun Pal Singh, which held that th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to acquire reserved land within the statutory period results in automatic lapsing of reservation and release of land to the owner.

The petitioner, Siddharam Shivappa Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a ...