Search Results for "UNCITRAL Model Law"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "UNCITRAL Model Law"

79 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Staying Arbitral Proceedings and Rejecting Preliminary Objection on Maintainability of Revision Petition Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The High Court's interference under Article 227 was held to be barred by Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the Act provides a complete mechanism for challenging arbitral orders.

14 Jul 2026

The present appeals arise from an interim order dated 02.09.2025 and a final order dated 28.01.2026 passed by the High Court of Gauhati in CRP/120/202...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in MSMED Act Arbitration Challenge — Pre-Deposit Must Include Interest. Section 19 of MSMED Act mandates 75% deposit of entire award amount, including compound interest, and Single Judge's order restricting deposit to principal was erroneous.

2 Apr 2026

The case involves an appeal by M/s.Unicon Engineers, the respondent in an arbitration petition, against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Madr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Land Development Dispute, Restoring Tribunal's Findings on Breach and Damages. The Court Clarifies Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Holding that High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction in Re-evaluating Factual Determinations.

21 Apr 2025

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 30th April 2015, which was rendered in appeals under Section 37 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Arbitral Award in Gold Ore Transportation Contract Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitrator's Findings on Measurement of Loads and Deductions Are Not Patent Illegality and Cannot Be Reappreciated in Appeal.

7 Dec 2020

The appellant, The Hatti Gold Mines Company Limited, a Karnataka State Government undertaking, was engaged in gold mining. It decided to increase prod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Software Implementation Dispute. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked due to respondent's failure to appoint arbitrator under agreement dated 30 October 2015.

30 Nov 2018

The applicant, SAP India Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

29 Oct 2015

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Parties to Arbitration in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Goods. Arbitration Clause in Purchase Orders Held Binding Despite Absence of Signed Agreement, as Parties Acted on Purchase Orders Containing Arbitration Clause.

26 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Sai Wardha Power Ltd. and its directors, were original defendants in a civil suit filed by the respondent, M/s. Goyal Dhatu Udyog Pvt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Arbitral Award — Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Arbitration Act Determined by First Application. Court holds that once a Section 34 petition is filed in a court, that court alone has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain all subsequent applications including execution, regardless of withdrawal.

23 Feb 2015

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which negated the appellant's contention that the cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Partnership Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Strong Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief. Court held that disputes regarding partnership accounts and alleged mismanagement must be resolved through arbitration, not by appointing receiver at interim stage.

22 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Minochar @ Minoo Aspandyar Irani, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)