Search Results for "Test identification parade"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in UAPA Terror Case, Upholding NIA Investigation and Rejecting Torture Allegations. Court holds that stringent bail conditions under Section 43D(5) of UAPA apply and that delay in raising torture claims without medical evidence is fatal.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed by accused persons (Rajendra Chaudhary and Dhan Singh in Appeal No.107/2026, and Manohar Narwaria and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Identification Process Was Flawed.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Udayakumar (A-2) against his conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder in Chicken Shop Quarrel Case. The court held that pressing the neck and giving fist blows with knowledge of likelihood of death constitutes culpable homicide under Section 304(II) IPC, not murder.

The case arises from an incident on 26/01/2015 at about 8:00 p.m. when the deceased Firoz Shaikh, who ran a chicken shop, refused to give chicken to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392 and 397 IPC set aside as sole identifying witness failed to identify accused in court and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the crime.

The appellant, Shaukatali Abdulsalem Shaikh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for offences under Sections 392 read with 34 and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Murder, Abduction, and Robbery Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Establish Conspiracy Under Section 120-B IPC Despite Lack of Direct Link Between Co-Accused.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Cyrone Rodrigues and Chandrakant Talwar & Pappu @ Appu against their conviction and sentencing by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Kidnapping, Rape, and Murder of Minor Girl Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Failure to Explain Under Section 106 Evidence Act Confirm Guilt Under Sections 366A, 376(2)(f), 302 IPC.

The appellant, Vijay Babasaheb Nanavare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No. 88 of 2006 for kidnapping a minor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Accused convicted under Sections 302 and 397 IPC for murder of aunt during robbery, with chain of circumstances establishing guilt.

The appellant, Ganesh Bhau Sonawane, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Sewree for the murder of his aunt, Laxmibai Narayankar, and for robbery of...