Search Results for "Suit Competency"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Advocate Petitioner in Land Fraud Case Under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 166 read with Section 34 Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Legal Advice Not Constituting Offence

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a criminal writ petition challenging orders impleading him as an accused in a land fraud case under IPC sections --...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Deputy Commissioner Cannot Exceed Revisional Jurisdiction Under Karnataka Municipalities Act – Karnataka High Court Quashes Building Licence and Khata Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice"

The petitioner challenged the orders dated 27.11.2013 and 02.08.2017 whereby the building licence granted in respect of the subject property was cance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Expunging of Expert Evidence Applying Foreign Law in Suit for Enforcement of Foreign Judgment. Expert Witness Cannot Apply Foreign Law to Facts; Only State the Law Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC and Section 45 Evidence Act.

The plaintiffs filed a Notice of Motion seeking to expunge parts of the affidavit of evidence of the defendants' expert witness, Mr. Patrick Keel, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (accused no.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (accused no.2), who were convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes NCW Proceedings Against KPMG in Service Dispute. National Commission for Women Lacks Jurisdiction Over Employment Grievances Under Section 10 of the National Commission for Women Act, 1990.

The petitioners, KPMG India Pvt. Ltd. and its Company Secretary Harsh Sagar Goyal, filed a writ petition seeking to quash proceedings initiated by the...