Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

322 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 322 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 17. Cooperative Bank's Recovery Action Upheld as Writ Not Maintainable When Statutory Remedy Exists.

The petitioners, Pimpri Chinchwad Sahakari Bank Maryadit and its Special Recovery Officer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Injunction Order in Pledge Dispute, Upholds Ad-Interim Relief Despite Delay in Pronouncement. Delay of Over One Year in Passing Interlocutory Order Does Not Automatically Vitiate It Unless Prejudice Is Demonstrated.

The case involves three commercial appeals filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 5 June 2023 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against De-Freezing of Bank Accounts in Seizure Case Under Section 102(3) CrPC — Delayed Reporting to Magistrate Does Not Vitiate Seizure Order; Requirement is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the first informant in Crime No.318 of 2022 against an order of the Madras High Court dated 09.08.2023, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Execution Case — Order Dismissing Section 47 Application Set Aside. Execution Court's Failure to Consider Objections Regarding Arbitral Award's Enforceability Constitutes Jurisdictional Error Under Section 115 CPC.

The present Civil Revision Petition was filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 19.03.2022 passed by...