Search Results for "Shops and Commercial Establishments Act"

105 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 105 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Bonafide Requirement of Landlord Not Established. Landlord's claim for additional space for business expansion fails as it already had sufficient alternate accommodation and the need was not genuine.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant (M/s. Parmar Plastic Products & Ors.) against the judgment and order of the Appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Appeals, Enhances Compensation for Dharuhera Village Acquisition. Land Losers Entitled to Rs. 1,49,14,975/- per Acre Based on Exemplary Sale Deeds Under Sections 4 and 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of twenty-seven appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings in Haryana. Sixteen appeals pertained to acqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Appellate Court's Dismissal of Suit. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove agreement and readiness and willingness, and suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property. The plaintiff, Manoj Manilal Gala (appellant), ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions in Motor Transport Workers Act. Court upholds sections 13 and 16 of Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 as constitutionally valid and not violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved and representative union for employees in the transport section of Brihanmumbai Electr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Working Hours Provisions of Motor Transport Workers Act. Provisions Permitting Extended Hours and Spread Over Upheld as Reasonable and Not Violative of Articles 14 and 21.

The petitioner, BEST Worker's Union, claiming to be an approved representative union for employees of Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Undertaking (BE...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...