Search Results for "Sharad Birdhichand Sarda case"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Benefit of Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 120B, 201 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Manjunatha and Mohan Kumar against their conviction by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction Overturned as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances and Comply with Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 in Recovery of Deceased's Body.

The appeal arose from a murder case where the appellant, Boby (accused No. 3), was convicted by the trial court and High Court for offences including ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Acquittal of Ten Accused Under Sections 143, 504, 324, 506, 307, 427 R/W 149 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 06.04.2016 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kolar, in S.C. No. 137/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Haresh Narendra Gharat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar for the murder of his wife Vaishali under Section 302 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses.

The appellant, Anil Shrawan More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's conviction for killing his wife by strangulation confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and motive established.

The appellant, Jitendra Motilal Nirmal, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Savitribai. The cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Police Constable for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Together, Recovery of Articles, and DNA Report Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Nilesh @ Nilikrao Ukarda Jadhav, a police constable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for the murder of an unknow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Doubtful Recovery. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sudhir Kanulna, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Additional Sessions Judge (2), South Goa, at Marg...