Search Results for "Section 53"

104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Order in Insolvency Resolution Plan Approval Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Resolution Plan Found Compliant with Section 30(2) and Binding on All Stakeholders Despite Pending Creditor Claim Challenges.

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against a judgment dated 4 January 2021 of the National Company Law App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenges to One-Man Committee's Final Employee Allocation Between Telangana and Andhra Pradesh Power Utilities. Allocation Under Section 82 of Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 Upheld as Final and Binding on All Parties.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of miscellaneous applications filed by Telangana power utilities, employees, and associations challenging the fina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petitions in Criminal Cases Alleging Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Cause of Action Not Wholly Absent in Gurugram

The petitioner, Kaushik Chatterjee, was appointed as Group Chief Risk Officer-Executive Director of a non-banking finance company (the second responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...