Search Results for "Section 5(1)(a)"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Forest Fire Prevention in Kodagu District. Writ of Mandamus Sought for Constitution of Task Force to Protect Forest, Wild Animals, and Birds from Fire.

The present writ petition was filed by the Prl.Convener of Kaveri Sene (R) under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Finding of Unfair Labour Practice in Layoff Case but Remands for Determination of Back Wages. Employer's Failure to Pay Layoff Compensation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Cylinders (Pvt.) Ltd., an industry engaged in manufacturing gas cylinders at Kalmeshwar, Nagpur, challenged the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Scrap Dealer Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles at Instance of Appellant Establish Guilt Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Jagdish Bansu Kharwal, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Sayyed Irfan Ul Huda under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act for Specific Act of Bribery Despite Absence of Sanction for Habitual Bribery Charge. Sanction Granted Under Section 6 for Offence Under Section 5(1)(d) Does Not Invalidate Trial Where Sanction for Section 5(1)(a) Was Lacking.

Background: The case involved an appeal against a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, raising the issue of whether a trial for tw...