Search Results for "Section 31(2) Specific Relief Act"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Purchaser Pendente Lite. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Impleadment Proper as Purchaser is Necessary Party to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings.

The petitioner, Fabrica Da Igreja De Vasco, purchased the suit property from the original defendant No.1 during the pendency of a suit filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Family Settlement Memorandum Registration. Court holds that memorandum recording pre-existing family arrangement does not require registration under Indian Registration Act, 1908, and parties acting upon it are estopped from resiling.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in a second appeal, which reversed the first appellate court's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Order of Reference to Arbitration in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction. Court Holds That Disputes Involving a Housing Society and Its Members Regarding Development Agreement Are Arbitrable Under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment arises from two appeals filed against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court referring the parties to arbitration under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Minor Children Seeking to Set Aside Family Settlement — Memorandum of Family Settlement Held Binding as a Family Arrangement Under Contract Act and Specific Relief Act

The plaintiffs, four children of Madhupati and Anuradha Singhania (Defendants 1 and 2), filed a suit seeking cancellation of a Memorandum of Family Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit Dismissed for Non-Prosecution. Dismissal of Suit for Possession Does Not Convert Tenant into Trespasser; Tenant Continues as Tenant.

The petitioners, who were tenants of a shop premises, were sued by the respondents (landlords) for possession and mesne profits. The trial court dismi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Corporation in Property Tax Refund Suit Filed by Co-operative Housing Society. Limitation for Refund Claim Runs from Date of Final Assessment Order, Not from Date of Payment, Under Section 23 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) appealed against a decree passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, in a suit filed by Kalpita Enclav...