Search Results for "Section 168 Companies Act 2013"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 168 Companies Act 2013"

88 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows MSRTC Appeal and Claimants' Cross-Objection in Motor Accident Claim — Future Prospects Not Applicable to Deemed Income of Student. Notional Income of Deceased Student Determined at Rs. 10,000 Per Month with 40% Deduction for Personal Expenses.

29 Oct 2025

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents and sister of a 20-year-old male student who died in a road accident. The de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Judicial Immunity and IBC Proceedings as Abuse of Process. Challenge to Section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 and Section 7 of IBC held to be frivolous and not maintainable.

20 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Mrs. Manisha Nimesh Mehta, as promoter and guarantor of M/s. Perfect Infraengineers Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

12 Apr 2022

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Error in Multiplier Application — Compensation Enhanced. The Court corrected the multiplier from 12 to 13 based on the deceased's age of 45 years under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and enhanced interest rate to 7.5% per annum.

26 Feb 2022

The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Arunkumar Pandya, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Applied Based on Deceased's Age and Income. The court held that the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier 13 instead of 14 and added 30% future prospects to notional income under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

9 Jul 2021

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 06.07.2013 passed by the XXIII Additional Small Cause Judge and XXI ACMM, MACT, Bengaluru, in MVC No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

5 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition to Quash FIR Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Due to False Allegations and Malicious Prosecution. The court quashed the FIR as the allegations were found to be false and motivated, and the wife had made contradictory statements.

16 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Sangeeta Santosh Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes IPC Offences in Electricity Theft Case After Compounding Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Dual Prosecution for Same Acts Not Permissible. The court held that once the offence under the special enactment (Electricity Act) is compounded, the IPC offences based on the same acts cannot be prosecuted, as the Electricity Act is a complete code and the compounding amounts to an election by the complainant.

9 Feb 2018

The applicant, Syed Yaqoob Syed Masood, a Taluka Agriculture Officer, filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 0273/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

29 Jun 2017

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)