Search Results for "Section 148 Income Tax Act"

745 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 745 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction — Dell India Pvt. Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 issued without proper sanction and by officer lacking territorial jurisdiction over assessee.

The petitioner, Dell India Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of computer hardware and related products. For the Assessment Y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Validity of Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2015-16. The Reopening Based on Alleged Escaped Income from Capital Reduction Transaction Is Contested on Grounds of Full Disclosure During Original Assessment.

The petitioner, an investment holding company incorporated in Singapore and under creditors' voluntary liquidation, held shares in Lehman Brothers Cap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2012-13 Due to Lack of Jurisdictional Sanction Under Section 151 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Without Proper Approval from Competent Authority Are Void Ab Initio.

The petitioner, an individual and citizen of India, filed a writ petition challenging the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tax Appeal in Family Settlement Capital Gains Case — Reopening Under Section 147/148 Invalid Due to Change of Opinion and Limitation. Consent Decree Approved by Civil Court Held to Be a Bona Fide Family Arrangement Not Attracting Capital Gains Tax.

The case involves a tax appeal by the Power of Attorney holder of Lorna Margaret Pinto, a Non-Resident Indian, against the Assistant Commissioner of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Already Scrutinized Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Sterlite Technologies Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reasse...