Search Results for "Section 138 NI Act"

478 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 478 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.

The appeal was filed by the complainant, Smt. G. Suma, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Account Closed. Cheque issued for time-barred debt not legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant's Partner. Failure to Prove Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Complainant Firm Not Properly Represented.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, were the accused in a complaint filed by M/s Fluidmac, a partnership f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice as Required by Section 138(b) of the Act.

The petitioner, M/s Soft-touch Computer through its proprietor Shashikant Bhaskar Zope, filed three criminal writ petitions under Section 482 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant Partner. Failure to Prove Legal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by M/s Reshmi Constructions, a partnership firm, against the acquittal of Laxman Vithal Chunek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Modifies Condition for Suspension of Sentence. Appellate Court's Direction to Deposit Compensation Upheld but Reduced to 50% Considering Financial Hardship.

The applicant, T. Veeruswami, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the trial court in Criminal Case No.16057 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Applicants' Challenge to Territorial Jurisdiction in Section 138 NI Act Complaints. Cheques Drawn on Mumbai Bank Cannot Be Tried at Aurangabad Despite Deposit There.

The applicants, Naveen Luthra and Arun Luthra, were accused in two complaints filed by respondent no.1, AVR Logistic Pvt. Ltd., under Section 138 of t...