Search Results for "SEBI regulations"

125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty on Managing Director in FEMA Violation Case — Failure to Complete Import Formalities Constitutes Continuing Offence. Liability under Section 10(6) of FEMA, 1999 attaches to person responsible for conduct of business regardless of change in management.

The appeal arose from complaint proceedings initiated by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 16(3) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Listed Company Seeking Copies of Seized Documents from GST Intelligence. Right to Copies Implicit Under CGST Act to Enable Compliance with SEBI Regulations and Audit Requirements.

The Petitioner, High Ground Enterprises Ltd., a company listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange with over 10,000 shareholders,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Alleging FDI Violations in Insurance Sector as Motivated by Personal Interest. Petitioner's failure to disclose material facts and filing of multiple petitions with similar allegations leads to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Sambhaji Savakar Jadhav, filed three public interest litigation petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favour of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute. Court upholds award based on documentary evidence and rejects challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, challenged an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...