Search Results for "Refund adjustment"

275 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 275 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Non-Compliance of DRP Directions Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Complete Assessment Within One Month of Receiving DRP Directions Renders Transfer Pricing Addition Time-Barred and Non-Est.

The Petitioner, Archroma International (India) Private Limited (formerly Huntsman International (India) Private Limited), filed a Writ Petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Compliance with Order VI Rule 17 CPC and Lack of Pleading Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to amend plaint to incorporate essential facts regarding readiness and willingness to perform contract, leading to dismissal of suit.

The plaintiff, Neeta Sawant, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 30th September 2016, by which the defendants agreed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Consumer Disputes Commission Order Challenged: Court Increases Interest on Refund for Delayed Flat Possession. Appeal Results in Enhanced Interest Rate from 9% to 12% for Complainants Against Parsvnath Developers Limited

This appeal challenges the order dated 29th September 2022, passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, which directed t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Rejection of Section 264 Application for FBT Refund. Intimation under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is an assessment order for the purpose of revision under Section 264.

The petitioner, Hindalco Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6 March 2019 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Principles of Natural Justice Violated as Show Cause Notices Were Issued Without Considering Petitioner's Reply.

The petitioner, M/s. Vinod Metal and M/s. Vinod Steel, proprietorship and HUF concerns of Vinodkumar Velraj Mehta, filed multiple writ petitions under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Pre-emptive Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act for Undervalued Property. Appropriate Authority's Valuation Based on Comparable Sales Upheld as Reasonable.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by prospective buyers (Krishna Kumar Rawat & Ors.) and partly allowed the appeal by the Union of India against a H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Security Deposit Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's finding that the amount was a refundable security deposit and not a loan, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, A. S. Patel Trust and its trustees, challenged an arbitral award dated 12 October 2018 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...