KAHC010822332025_1
8 Jul 2026The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard two intra-court writ appeals filed by M/s MP24 Construction Company, the lead member of a cons...
Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"
367 result(s) found
Found 367 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession of Suit Schedule Properties Including Business Establishment. The Court held that the plaintiff proved the existence of joint family properties and the defendant failed to establish that the business was his separate property.
28 Apr 2026The appellant, Vardhaman Lengade, was defendant No.2 in a partition suit filed by respondent No.1, Sital Lengade, and others. The suit sought partitio...
- 200
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Allotment of Hoarding Site. The Court upheld the Collector's allotment of a hoarding site to Respondent No. 5 and the Minister's rejection of the Petitioner's review application, finding no illegality or violation of policy.
19 Oct 2023The Petitioner, Sanjiv Manmohan Gupta, carrying on business as M/s. Global Advertisers, challenged the order dated 20th August 2021 allotting a hoardi...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Hoarding Allotment Due to Procedural Irregularities and Non-Compliance with Government Resolutions. The court held that the allotment of a hoarding site on government land without following the prescribed procedure of inviting tenders and without considering the petitioner's prior rights was illegal and arbitrary.
19 Oct 2023The Petitioner, Sanjiv Manmohan Gupta, carrying on business as M/s. Global Advertisers, challenged the order dated 20th August 2021 allotting a hoardi...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.
7 Apr 2022The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit — Partnership Firm Not a Necessary Party Under Order 30 CPC. The court held that Order 30 Rule 1 CPC is permissive and non-joinder of a partnership firm does not vitiate eviction proceedings against individual partners.
25 Nov 2019The applicant, a tenant (son of the original tenant), filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) ...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Wife to File Mutual Divorce Petition Through Power of Attorney Holder Under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court held that a power of attorney holder can sign and verify a petition for divorce by mutual consent when the spouse is residing abroad, as the requirement of personal presence is not mandatory at the filing stage.
6 Apr 2018The petitioner, Harshada Bharat Deshmukh, an Indian citizen residing abroad, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Principal Judge, Famil...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Case — Defendant's Plastic Container Found Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Design Under Designs Act, 2000. The court applied the 'eye test' and held that the overall impression of the Defendant's product was identical to the Plaintiff's registered design, despite minor differences in colour.
1 Jul 2016The Plaintiffs, Selvel Industries and Sears Industries, filed a suit for infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, against the Defenda...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case — Cheque Not Drawn on Accused's Account. Applicant cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was drawn on the account of a proprietorship firm, not on the personal account of the accused.
12 Feb 2016The applicant, Dr. (Mrs) Rajul Ketan Raj, was accused no.1 in three complaints filed by Reliance Capital Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Seeking Eligibility Certificates Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993 — Holds That Industrial Units Commencing Production After 1.1.1999 Are Entitled to Benefits Under the Scheme Despite Government Resolution Dated 7.5.1993 Being Superseded by Resolution Dated 31.3.1999. The Court Ruled That the Scheme Continued to Operate for Units Which Had Applied and Were Eligible Under the Earlier Resolution, and That the Respondents Could Not Deny Benefits on Ground of Non-Issuance of Eligibility Certificate.
25 Jul 2012The petitioners, four industrial units (Shraddha Polymats, Raj Industries, Alpha Plast, and Jayesh Chandulal Shah), filed writ petitions under Article...
- 57
