Search Results for "Pain shock and suffering"

260 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Pillion Rider in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Not Disputed, Tribunal's Award Found Inadequate. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,21,000 to Rs.2,50,000 with 9% Interest for Grievous Injuries Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Chhitubhai Harmanbhai Patel, was the original claimant in a motor accident claim petition. On 24.04.2002, he was a pillion rider on a H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Pedestrian in Motor Accident Claim. Tribunal's assessment of functional disability and future loss of income revised; compensation increased from Rs.4,05,500/- to Rs.6,42,700/-.

The appellant, Ganpatbhai Bhagabhai Rathwa, filed a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Minor Cyclist in Motor Accident Claim Appeal. Notional Income of Rs. 6,000 per month applied for 17½-year-old student engaged in agriculture, with multiplier of 18 and 40% future prospects, reducing interest rate from 9% to 7.5% per annum.

The appellant, Bharatbhai Dayabhai Thakor, a 17½-year-old student, was injured in a motor accident on 16.11.2009 when a truck driven rashly and negli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim with Permanent Disability — Multiplier Corrected from 14 to 15 and Future Prospects Added Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimant's Notional Income Reassessed at Rs. 6,500 per Month for Diamond Polisher Injured in 2002 Accident.

The appellant, Bhagwanbhai Dhanjibhai Kalsariya, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Vakalatnama in Summary Suit — Defendant's Delay of 282 Days Condoned Subject to Costs of Rs. 25,000/-. The Court held that the delay was not intentional and the Defendant had a valid defence, thus condoned the delay in the interest of justice.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the Defendant, Marianella Properties Pvt. Ltd., in a Commercial Summary Suit filed by the Plaintiff, Swas...