Search Results for "Order XXIII"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Hindu Marriage Act Divorce Case Based on Joint Compromise. Family Court Dismissal Set Aside and Divorce Granted in Terms of Compromise Memo Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a divorce petition by the Family Court, Namakkal. The appellant/husband had filed F.C.O.P.No.335 of 2022 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit in Property Dispute Due to Misdescription of Property. Error in Describing Sites Constitutes a Formal Defect Under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioner, Satish Daniel, was the plaintiff in O.S. No.71/2017 before the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Raichur, seeking declaration of ownership and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Possession and Removal of Obstruction. Earlier Suit Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit Does Not Bar Subsequent Suit if Cause of Action is Different.

The revision application was filed by the original defendant No.1 against the order of the Jt. Civil Judge, Junior Division, Gangapur, dismissing his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Decree Holder in Specific Performance Suit — Compromise Decree Held Executable Despite Alleged Lack of Court Verification. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree Under Section 47 CPC Unless Decree is a Nullity on Face of Record.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the decree holder (Rehan Ahmad) against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court, which had set aside th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition to Quash Industrial Court Order in Closure Dispute. Single Workman Cannot Re-agitate Closure After Majority Settlement and Unconditional Withdrawal of Union Complaint.

The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai dated 18/03/1998, which permitted respondent no.1 (a workman) ...