Search Results for "Mutation Entries"

489 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 489 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Registered Deed Not Mandatory for Relinquishment of Right; Revenue Entries Have Evidentiary Value.

The appellant, Hansaben w/o Jivan Bariya, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the concurrent fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Refusing Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Government Land. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Tahsildar Must Hear Parties Before Refusing Mutation Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act.

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts. Family Arrangement and Benami Transaction Allegations Rejected as Property Purchased by Deceased from Own Earnings and Joint Family Income.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the wife and children of the deceased Macchhindra against his brothers (appellants). The plaintiffs sought...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Records — Dispute Over Title Cannot Be Decided in Revenue Proceedings Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, ten individuals claiming to be the legal heirs of one Ganpat Surpame, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Must Be Based on Lawful Possession or Title. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title Disputes and Must Respect Civil Court Decrees.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners, who are legal representatives of the original owners of agricultural lands in Korali, T...