Search Results for "Mauritius"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Mauritius"

110 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 110 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BSNL's Petition Against MSEDCL for Wrongful Tariff Categorization Under Electricity Act, 2003. Telecom Service Provider Cannot Be Classified as 'Commercial' for Electricity Tariff Purposes; MERC Must Determine Correct Category.

16 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), a telecom service provider and a central public sector enterprise, filed a writ petition under Artic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging State Government's Notification Declaring 22 January 2024 as Public Holiday for Ram Lalla Pran-Pratishtha. Court holds that the notification was validly issued under Section 25 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the Central Government's notification of 8 May 1968, and that the decision was not arbitrary or violative of secular principles.

21 Jan 2024

The petitioners, law students from colleges in Maharashtra and Gujarat, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a notification dated 19 January...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Charter Party Dispute Over Detention Charges. Arbitration agreement held valid and arbitrable despite respondent's objections regarding limitation and non-signing of charter party.

28 Jul 2023

The applicant, Alliance Import and Export, a partnership firm, filed two arbitration applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in FII Capital Gains Tax Case — Remands to ITAT for Fresh Consideration of Article 24 DTAA Compliance. Interpretation of Article 24 of India-Singapore DTAA requires examination of whether capital gains were subject to tax in Singapore on receipt basis.

21 Jun 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) - 2 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 24 March 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Director for Company Tax Dues — Holds Revenue Failed to Prove Lack of Diligence or Recovery from Company. Petitioner not liable as director under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for taxes of Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2008-09 and 2009-10 because Revenue did not establish that tax could not be recovered from the company despite reasonable efforts.

12 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Prakash B. Kamat, a mechanical engineer, developed a smart card-based ticketing solution and incorporated Kaizen Automation Pvt. Ltd. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Director in Income Tax Recovery — Director Not in Charge During Relevant Period. Section 179(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 requires that the person sought to be made liable must have been in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business of the company during the relevant period; mere directorship at the time of default is insufficient.

20 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Geeta P. Kamat, challenged an order dated 22 December 2017 passed by the Income Tax Officer under Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award Holding Put and Call Options in Share Purchase Agreement as Enforceable. The court held that clauses 8.5 and 8.5.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement are not forward contracts or derivatives under SCRA and SEBI circulars, and the Single Judge erred in setting aside the award.

2 Feb 2023

The appellants, Percept Finserve Private Limited and Percept Limited, entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Edelweiss Financial Services Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

20 Jan 2023

The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Reference Dispute — Compromise Decree Bars Invocation of Arbitration Clause. Held that once a suit is decreed on compromise, the arbitration clause cannot be invoked for the same dispute, and the subsequent money suit based on the compromise is not covered by the arbitration agreement.

30 Jul 2019

The appellant, Zenith Drugs & Allied Agencies Pvt. Ltd., was appointed as a clearing and forwarding agent by M/s Rhone Poulene India Limited (RPIL) un...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)