Search Results for "Market Risk"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Derivative Transaction Dispute. Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails as Award Not Patently Illegal or Perverse.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 6 July 2012 dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets

The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Disposes Multiple Motor Accident Claims Appeals Filed Under Section 173(1) of MV Act. Batch of appeals against MACT awards involving compensation enhancement and insurance liability disputes.

The provided text is a compilation of multiple Motor Accident Claims appeals (MFA) listed before the Karnataka High Court, Kalaburagi Bench on 22 Dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Upholds Compensation for Third-Party Injuries. Insurer's Liability Under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Cannot Be Avoided on Ground of Breach of Policy Conditions Without Evidence of Wilful Default.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. filed three appeals against a common judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation to thre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for LIC Policyholder Due to Deficiency of Service in Jeevan Aastha Plan. LIC's failure to process proposal and wrongful retention of premium for five years amounts to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Madhav Hari Joshi, submitted a proposal to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under its Jeevan Aastha Plan on 31 January 200...