Search Results for "Manufacturer's Address"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case — Crude Degummed Soyabean Oil Not an Agricultural Product Under Notification No. 53/2003-Cus. Nexus Between Imported and Exported Products Established Under DFCE Scheme.

The appellant, Noble Resources and Trading India Private Limited (formerly Andagro Services Pvt. Ltd.), a government-recognized two-star export house,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Manufacturer in Food Adulteration Case Due to Belated Filing After Expiry of Best Before Date. Right Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Frustrated as Complaint Filed 16 Months After Best Before Date.

The applicant, M/s Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturing company, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Former Employees and Transporter for Design Infringement and Passing Off of Copper Tubes. Registered Designs under Designs Act, 2000 held valid and infringed by identical products.

The plaintiff, Mandev Tubes Pvt Ltd, a manufacturer of copper tubes since 1964 with an annual turnover of Rs. 11 crores, filed a suit alleging design ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Watch Manufacturer Against Seizure Under Packaged Commodities Rules. Watches Sold in Boxes Are Not Pre-Packaged Commodities Under Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules 1977.

The petitioner, Titan Industries Ltd., a manufacturer and seller of watches, challenged the seizure of its watches by the respondents (Union of India ...