Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

526 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Patent Infringement Case — Rejects Challenge to Maintainability of Suit. Court holds that a suit for infringement of a patent is maintainable even if the patent is not registered under the Designs Act, 2000, as long as it qualifies as a patent under the Patents Act, 1970.

15 Dec 2025

The appellant, M/s. Permanent Magnets Limited, filed a suit for infringement of its patent against the respondent, Mahipat Yadav. The respondent filed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Federation Against Labour Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Workman Status Denied Due to Supervisory Role. Respondent's designation as Centre In-charge with supervisory duties excluded him from definition of 'workman' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

6 Apr 2023

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra Rajya Sahakari Kapus Utpadak Panan Mahasangh Maryadit (the Federation) challenging the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal.

10 Oct 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by State Government Challenging Regularization of Daily Wagers. Industrial Court's direction to grant permanent status to daily wagers who worked for years under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act is upheld as no unfair labour practice was committed.

23 Apr 2015

The case involves three writ petitions filed by the Government of Maharashtra and Government Polytechnic College, Arvi, challenging a common judgment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Directing Permanency for Work Charged Deputy Engineer in Municipal Council — Unfair Labour Practice Established Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court held that a Deputy Engineer appointed on work charged basis who worked for more than 3 years is a workman under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the employer's failure to make him permanent despite availability of permanent posts amounts to unfair labour practice under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

12 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 22.7.1998 which allowed the complaint filed by Resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Manager in MRTU and PULP Act Case — Lack of Specific Allegations and Limitation Bar. Complaint under Section 48 of MRTU and PULP Act fails as no specific allegations of responsibility for compliance of interim order and complaint filed beyond six months.

28 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Maruti s/o Narsingrao Ladde, was the Manager (P. & A.) of Ashok Leyland Limited. The Ashok Leyland United Employees' Union, a Represen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Non-Disclosure of Offence Under MRTU & PULP Act — Transfer Order Violation Not Sufficient to Attract Section 48 Without Specific Averments of Unfair Labour Practice. The court held that a complaint under Section 48 of the MRTU & PULP Act must disclose the unfair labour practice alleged; mere violation of an order quashing transfer does not constitute an offence.

21 Mar 2005

The petitioners, Modi Xerox Limited and its officers, challenged a criminal complaint filed by the respondent, Ms. Niloo Makhija, under Section 48 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Daily Wage Employees Challenging Termination — Appointments Were Irregular and Not Entitled to Regularisation. Termination Due to Completion of Project Is Not Illegal and Industrial Disputes Act Does Not Apply to Zilla Parishad.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 24 daily wage employees of Zilla Parishad, Dhule, filed writ petitions challenging their termination of services. They were appointed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Medical Authorities Challenging Industrial Court Orders Reinstating Nurses with Back Wages. Held that Industrial Court has jurisdiction under MRTU & PULP Act to entertain complaints of unfair labour practices by employees of public health department.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by the Medical Superintendent of Rural Hospital, Gondpipri, and other health department offic...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)