Search Results for "Karnataka High Court Arbitration Rules"

183 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 183 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Allows Writ Appeals in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that cancellation of tender due to change in government policy does not amount to willful disobedience of court order under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The case involves a dispute over a tender issued by the State of Karnataka for the selection of a creative agency for the 'Invest Karnataka 2022' even...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Roznama Entry Dismissing Arbitration Suit in Absence of Signed Judgment. Failure to Comply with Sections 33 and Order XX Rules 1 and 2 CPC Renders Pronouncement Invalid, Directs Fresh Hearing on Merits.

The petitioner, M/s Karnataka Cement Pipes Factory Eng. and Contractors, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging a Ro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Arbitration for Lack of Arbitration Agreement. Developer Fails to Prove Existence of Arbitration Clause in Development Agreement with Cooperative Housing Society.

The petitioner, M/s. Panama Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the judgment is not a ground for review.

The review petition was filed by Kotak Securities Ltd. seeking review of the judgment dated 22.02.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in RFA No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons to Arbitrator in Section 34 Proceedings — Arbitrator Not a Necessary Party Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator cannot be arrayed as defendant in arbitration suit challenging award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sri H.N.M. Prasad, a practicing advocate, acted as an arbitrator and passed an arbitral award on 10.3.2015 in a dispute between Smt. V...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Execution of Arbitral Award Without Decree — Arbitral Award Cannot Be Executed Directly Under Section 38 CPC Without Prior Decree Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sri Chandrashekhar, was the judgment debtor in execution proceedings before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mysore. The dec...