Search Results for "KVAT Act, 2003"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Orders in KVAT Act Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 53(8) of KVAT Act cannot be imposed without assessment and opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, M/s B.L. Kashyap & Sons Ltd., a company engaged in civil works contracts, challenged orders dated 8.9.2017 passed by the Joint Commiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Legality of Penalty Imposed Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Misuse of C-Forms in Cement Industry. Court Examines Whether Penalty is Sustainable When Purchased Goods Are Included in Registration Certificate and Used for Purposes Other Than Manufacturing.

The High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, heard a sales tax appeal and connected revision petitions concerning the levy of penalty under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revision Petitions in VAT Case — Land Cost Deduction at 40% Upheld. Assessee failed to prove actual land cost exceeding 40% of sale consideration under KVAT Act, 2003.

The petitioner, M/s. Nandi Constructions, a builder and civil works contractor engaged in construction and sale of apartments, filed revision petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows State Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Vegit-Aloo Hara Bara Kebab Held Not a Vegetable Product. Classification under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 depends on predominant ingredient and common parlance, not processing method.

The State of Karnataka filed a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act challenging the order of a learned Single Judge in Writ Pet...