Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

458 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Complainant's Failure to Support Prosecution Case and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Death of Respondents. Acquittal of Public Servants under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

17 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 20.11...

High Court

High Court declined to quash the FIR Against Advocate in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Settlement not applicable. The court held that the applicant, not being a public servant, could not be charged under Sections 7 and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 However case of abatement made out and therefore section 12 of PC Act sustained

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from an FIR registered against the applicant, an advocate, for offences under Sections 7, 12, and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Trial Court's Acquittal of Police Constable Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Foundational Facts.

5 Feb 2026

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Ashokbhai Rambhai Der, a police constable, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

4 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2023

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, dated 6th April 2009, which acquitted the respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

19 Dec 2019

The appellant, Kashinath Shiru Ahire, was a maintenance surveyor in the Land Record office at Sindkheda, District Dhule. He was convicted by the Speci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

12 Jul 2019

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Jan 2016

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (Appellant No.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

18 Jan 2016

The case pertains to two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (accused no.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (accused no.2), who were convicted by th...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)