Search Results for "Hyderabad Karnataka Area"

261 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 261 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces CAV Order in Writ Petition Against Encroachment Removal Orders Under Panchayat Raj Rules. Petitioners Alleged to Have Suppressed Material Facts and Withdrawn Civil Suit.

The Petitioners, Smt. Hombalamma and Sri Appaji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Single Judge's Order on State Government's Authority Over Inter-State Electricity Transmission. The Court examined whether the State Government could extend its Order to inter-state transmission of electricity under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ appeals filed by the State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC), Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Lim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Directs BBMP to Consider Apartment Owners' Complaint Against Building Licence Granted Over Common Amenity Area. Undivided Share in Entire Property Conveyed by Sale Deeds Includes Land Reserved for RWHU and STP; Builder Cannot Unilaterally Alter Approved Plan.

The petitioner, Keerthi Harmony Apartment Owners Association, challenged a building licence granted by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.

Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Caste Claims for Migrants from Former Hyderabad State Areas in Scheduled Caste Certificate Cases. Parents' Migration from Bidar District (Now in Karnataka) Before States Reorganization Does Not Disqualify Claimants Under Constitution Scheduled Castes Order, 1950.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Preeti Gopalrao Kamble and Narsabai d/o Govind Kamble (alias Neha w/o Ghamsham Kamble) challenging o...