COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018
18 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd"
227 result(s) found
Found 227 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — Withdrawal of Section 11 Petition Does Not Bar Fresh Application Under IBC. Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Not Applicable to Arbitration Petitions; Section 9 IBC and Section 11 Arbitration Act Seek Different Reliefs.
18 Nov 2024The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had appointed a sole arbitra...
- 2183
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Process in Public Procurement Case — MSE Policy Compliance Not Violated. Petitioner's failure to opt for MSE purchase preference on GeM portal disentitled it to preferential treatment, and no procedural irregularity was established in the reverse auction or bid price modifications.
25 Oct 2024The petitioner, GTI Infotel Private Limited, an MSE entity, challenged the entire tender process of respondent No.1, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation L...
- 456
High Court
High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.
20 Aug 2024The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...
- 340
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Tender Blacklisting Dispute — Non-Disclosure of Show Cause Notice Not a Violation of Declaration Clause. Court holds that a show cause notice does not amount to blacklisting and that the declaration format only required disclosure of actual blacklisting, not pending proceedings.
1 Apr 2019The case involves a tender floated by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) for setting up call centres. Caretel Infotech Ltd. participated a...
- 242
High Court
High Court Allows Amalgamated Company's Claim for Unabsorbed Depreciation of Sick Company Under Section 32(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that unabsorbed depreciation of amalgamating company is deemed to be depreciation of amalgamated company under Section 32(6) and can be carried forward irrespective of whether amalgamating company filed returns.
7 Sep 2017The case involves two income tax appeals filed by M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. (BILT) against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur, conc...
- 52
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts. Creditor's Statutory Demand for USD 3 Million Remained Unpaid, Leading to Order for Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956.
18 Nov 2016The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.
18 Nov 2016The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and appointed the Official Liquidator to take charge of its assets.
18 Nov 2016The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax on Furnace Oil Used as Fuel in Manufacturing. Furnace Oil Used as Fuel is Not 'Raw Material' or 'Input' for Production, Hence Not Exempt from Sales Tax Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959.
21 Feb 2006The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the levy of sales tax on furnace oil used by the pet...
- 59
