Search Results for "HSR Layout"

79 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR Against Police Inspector in Corruption Case. Court Finds Prima Facie Material for Investigation, Not a Fit Case for Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The petitioner, a Police Inspector formerly posted at Byatarayanapura Police Station, investigated Crime No.247/2022 for theft and recovered Rs.72 lak...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Telgi Stamp Paper Scam. Multiple Accused Including Kingpin Abdul Karim Telgi Challenge Conviction Under IPC Sections 255-260, 120B.

The judgment text provided is incomplete and does not contain the final decision. This batch of criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 660/2009, 510/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010069912016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Status Quo Order in Property Suit — Interim Order Upheld to Prevent Irreversible Changes Pending Trial. The court held that the trial court's discretion in granting status quo was judicious and proper under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC.

The appellant, M/s Bagmane Constructions Pvt. Ltd., was the 11th defendant in a civil suit (O.S.No.4743/2012) pending before the Principal City Civil ...