Search Results for "Forest Offence"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Conduct. Conviction under Sections 366, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Conduct Inconsistent with Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Shailesh Mahadeo Lanjewar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for offences under Sections 366, 376(2)(f) and 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by six appellants against their conviction and sentence by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Seizure Without Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal. Section 53 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Authorize Seizure of Vehicles; Principles of Natural Justice Violated.

The petitioners filed multiple writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging t...