Search Results for "Disclaimer"

128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Medical Education for Persons with Disabilities — Ensures Equal Opportunity and Reasonable Accommodation

The Supreme Court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order and directed admission of a PwD candidate to the MBBS course, emphasizing the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute Over Depreciation Rate for Fire-Damaged Machinery. Court Holds That Insured's Failure to Reinstate Damaged Property Within Extended Time Renders Reinstatement Value Clause Inoperative, Entitling Only Market Value on Depreciation Basis.

The dispute arose from a fire accident on 12.12.1998 that destroyed the '20 Hi Cold Rolling Mill' of the insured, M/s Bhushan Steel and Strips Ltd (la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Letters of Administration Case Under Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court upheld concurrent findings that the will was genuine and properly proved, rejecting arguments based on delay and inapplicability of presumption under Section 90 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court affirming a trial court decree granting letters of administration under Section 278 of the...