Search Results for "Continuous Occupation"

464 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 464 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Between Brothers — Sets Aside Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Possession. Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership and Adverse Possession Against Co-Owner Brother.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 07.11.2007 in O.S.No.3163/1990 passed by the XV Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Upholding Eviction: Court Rules in Favor of Landlord Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act" "Conclusive Evidence in Written Agreements Seals Eviction; Jurisdictional and Procedural Claims Dismissed"

The case involves the eviction proceedings under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, based on Leave and License Agreements between t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff's Claim for Possession in Property Dispute Based on Title and Rejects Adverse Possession Defense. Licensee's Possession Cannot Be Converted into Adverse Possession Without Clear Evidence of Ouster.

The dispute pertained to a suit property in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, A. Krishnappa, claimed ownership of the property as joint family proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Land Sale Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Petition Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence and That Award Was Not Perverse.

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of the Principal Dist...