Search Results for "Consent under Section 67(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Consent under Section 67(2)"

114 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trademark Infringement Suit by Bristol Bakery Against Grupo Bimbo for 'Bimbo' Mark, Finding No Deceptive Similarity. The court held that the marks 'Bristol' and 'Bimbo' are not deceptively similar and that the defendant had prior rights, thereby refusing interim injunction and granting injunction in favor of the defendant.

6 Jul 2026

The judgment concerns two cross-suits between Bristol Bakery (plaintiff in one suit) and Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. DE C.V. and its affiliates (defendants in ...

High Court

Madras High Court Adjudicates Trademark Opposition Over 'Big Bite' Mark in Class 30. Court Considers Application of Prior User Test and Relevance of Trans-Border Reputation Under Trademarks Act, 1999.

11 Feb 2026

The appeals were filed under Section 91 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 against a common order dated 18.7.2014 by the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks. The...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Final Decree Application in Mortgage Suit Despite Limitation — Time Spent in Earlier Litigation Excluded Under Section 14 of Limitation Act. The court held that the plaintiff's final decree application was within limitation as the period during which the defendant challenged the ex parte decree was excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

29 Jan 2026

The case arises from a mortgage suit filed by M/s. Visu Financiers (plaintiff) against G. Sundararaj (defendant) for recovery of money due on a mortga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Rejection of Discharge in MPID Act Case – Alleged Fraudulent Hosiery Scheme – No Discharge as Prima Facie Case Exists

2 May 2025

The appellant, Smt. Neelam Rajendra Nanaware, filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Fin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Dispute over property sale agreement held to be purely contractual, not constituting criminal offence under Section 420 IPC.

22 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sourish Bose and Deepanvita Ghosh, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) and Sec...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Order Restoring Ex-Parte Regular Appeal Filed by Defendant in Title Suit. Presumption of Service Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897 Stands Unrebutted as Power of Attorney Holder Lacked Personal Knowledge to Lead Evidence.

10 Sep 2024

The Civil Revision Petition arose out of a title suit (O.S. No. 466/2011) filed by one Smt. Akkayamma seeking declaration of title and permanent injun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.

30 Oct 2015

The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 5634 OF 2014

30 Oct 2015

Three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a group of workers, including Aayas and Ward Boys, challenging the c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 179 Order Against Former Director for Tax Dues of Company — No Evidence of Neglect or Misfeasance. Director Who Resigned Before Relevant Assessment Year Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Default Under Section 179 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

27 Apr 2010

The petitioner, Dinesh T. Tailor, was appointed as an Additional director of Yazad Investment & Finance Private Limited on 2 January 1987. He signed a...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)