Search Results for "Concurrent findings of fact"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Concurrent findings of fact"

83 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Money Recovery Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Debt and Interest. Courts below correctly relied on balance confirmation letter and power-of-attorney holder's evidence under Order 3 Rule 2 CPC.

23 Jun 2026

The respondent/plaintiff filed Regular Civil Suit No. 298 of 2012 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur, seeking recovery of Rs. 3,05,045/-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant's claim for injunction based on title failed as courts below concurrently held that the suit property was a public road and not part of appellant's land.

18 Jun 2026

The appellant filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 18th February 20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Suit Property Was Joint Family Property and Plaintiffs Were Entitled to Share.

18 Jun 2026

The appellants, who were the defendants in a partition suit, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeals in Bogus Purchases Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Addition of 10% of Gross Profit Margin on Unproved Purchases Upheld as No Substantial Question of Law Arises.

5 Mar 2025

The case involves six Income Tax Appeals filed by Refrigerated Distributors Pvt Ltd (now known as Partytime Ice Pvt Ltd) against the Deputy Commission...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Possession Over Suit Property. The Court held that the plaintiff must succeed on the strength of his own title and possession, not on the weakness of the defendants' case, and that the concurrent findings of fact by the courts below cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC unless a substantial question of law arises.

20 Jan 2025

The plaintiff, Rajaraman, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, Ravi and Sekar, claiming that he was in possession and enjoyme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Revenue Authorities in Pond Land Dispute. High Court Exceeded Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 by Reappreciating Evidence Without Perversity.

9 Jan 2025

The dispute pertains to Khasra No.103 (formerly Khasra No.84) in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. In 1970, the land was recorded as 'Johad (Pond)' in revenue...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions of Granite Dealer in VAT/CST Case — No Substantial Question of Law. Assessee failed to prove inter-State stock transfer; Tribunal's concurrent findings of fact upheld under Section 65(1) of KVAT Act, 2003.

6 Jul 2018

The petitioner, M/s. Shanthakoti Enterprises, a dealer engaged in extraction and sale of rough granite blocks from quarries in Chamarajanagar, filed r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Tribunal Order Confirming Eviction of Tenant for Non-Payment of Rent Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961. The Court held that concurrent findings of fact regarding default in payment of rent cannot be interfered with under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

2 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Sri B. Hanumanthappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property.

19 Apr 2017

The appellants, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Abdulsab Nannesab Totad @ Jekinkatti, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute Involving Shivaji Education Society. Court upholds concurrent findings of fact that the suit properties were not trust properties and that the plaintiffs failed to prove their title.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves four second appeals filed by the appellants, who are office bearers of Shivaji Education Society, against the respondents. The dispu...

6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)