CMA(PT).No.46 of 2024
18 Mar 2025Background: This is an appeal filed under Section 117-A of the Patents Act, 1970 by the applicant against the order of the Controller of Patents rejec...
Search Results for "Cipla Ltd."
76 result(s) found
Found 76 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Controller's Refusal of Patent Registration Due to Non-Consideration of Arbitral Award and Deed of Assignment. Failure to Appreciate Evidence and Raise Objections in Examination Report Renders Order Unsustainable Under Section 15 of Patents Act, 1970.
11 Mar 2025The petitioner, Euro-apex B.V., entered into a licence agreement with Shinhan Apex Corporation in 1993, authorizing the latter to manufacture and sell...
- 427
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Injunction Applications Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC — Court Held That Plaintiff's Possession and Title Must Be Protected Pending Suit.
19 Jan 2024The appellant, Smt. Jagadishwari, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the o...
- 228
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Assumes Suo Motu Jurisdiction to Address COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services. The Court directed the Union of India to report on coordination, allocation, and management of oxygen, essential drugs, vaccination, and medical infrastructure under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, emphasizing a bounded-deliberative approach without usurping executive roles.
30 Apr 2021The Supreme Court of India initiated a suo motu writ petition in response to the unprecedented humanitarian crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Th...
- 253
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against IPAB Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Patent Pre-Grant Opposition. Pre-grant opponent not heard before allowing patent appeal, order set aside and matter remanded.
5 Nov 2020The petitioner, Dhaval Diyora, filed a pre-grant opposition under Section 25(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 against the patent application of Respondent ...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Asset Disclosure Application Against Judgment Debtors Despite Suit Disposal — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Applicable in Execution Proceedings. Court Rejects Functus Officio Argument and Holds That Existence of Security Does Not Bar Disclosure Order.
14 Jan 2019The Plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1.26 Crores against the Defendants, which was decreed by consent terms dated 14th June 2016, wherein the...
- 187
