Search Results for "Capital Investment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Capital Investment"

728 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 728 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal on Allocation of Expenses in Section 80IB Deduction Case. Tribunal's Remand Upheld as Earlier Decision Not Challenged; Questions on Separate Unit Status and Depreciation Adjustment Admitted.

1 Mar 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Non-Compete Fee — Amount Received for Non-Compete Agreement Not Taxable as Business Income Under Section 28(va) of Income Tax Act, 1961 When Assessee Not Carrying on Business in Relevant Year. Non-Compete Fee is Capital Receipt, Not Business Income, and Not Taxable as Capital Gains as No Transfer of Capital Asset.

13 Apr 2015

The case involves two appeals by Arun Toshniwal and Anurag A. Toshniwal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a PIL filed by a trade union of airport employees, pronounced an order on 14-09-2021, examining the legality of the privatisation of Mangaluru International Airport under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The court considered allegations that the concession agreement with Adani Enterprises Limited violated Sections 12, 12A, and 21 of the Act, and that the bidding process lacked transparency.

14 Sep 2021

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Airports Authority Employees Union, a registered trade ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Department's Find that Colliery Sale Profits Are Business Income and Disallows Carry Forward of Ice Factory Loss. Isolated Transaction of Prospecting and Selling a Coal Mine Held to be Business Activity Under Income Tax Act, 1922, and Loss Cannot Be Carried Forward After Cessation of Business.

20 Feb 1969

The assessee, a private limited company, carried on multiple businesses including coal mining and a dry ice factory. It obtained a prospecting licence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case, Upholds Tribunal's Selection of Comparables. The Court held that the Tribunal's exclusion and inclusion of comparables based on functional analysis was correct and did not give rise to a substantial question of law under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

12 Sep 2022

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

30 Nov 2022

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Amalgamation Between Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Under Section 394 of Companies Act, 1956 — Restructuring of Casby Group Approved. Court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not contrary to public interest, with no objections from Regional Director.

19 Mar 2015

The judgment concerns a petition filed by Casby CFS Pvt. Ltd. (Transferor) and Casby Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (Transferee) seeking sanction of a scheme of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Reason to Believe — Amount Received on Retirement from Partnership Firm Held to be Capital Receipt Not Chargeable to Tax.

22 Feb 2010

The petitioners, Prashant S. Joshi and Dattaram Shridhar Bhosale, were partners in a real estate development partnership firm. They retired from the p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Share Capital/Premium Case — Assessee Failed to Prove Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness of Investors Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act. The onus under Section 68 is on the assessee to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions; mere production of documents is insufficient when investor companies are non-existent or unresponsive.

1 Jan 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Delhi High Court in an income tax appeal concerning the assessment year 2009-10. The respondent-asses...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. The court held that the ITAT's concurrent findings on the genuineness of share capital transactions and the applicability of Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, did not give rise to any substantial question of law.

20 Apr 2015

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appella...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)