Search Results for "Bombay Furlough and Parole Rules 1959"

80 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Against Special Court Orders Outside Bench's Territorial Limits Lie Only to Principal Seat. Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Location of Court, Not Place of Offence Under Chapter XXXI of Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960.

The case involved a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad to determine the territorial jurisdiction for appeals against o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Parole to Life Convict in COVID-19 Parole Case Due to Practical Construction of Rule. Condition of Two Prior Releases Cannot Be Applied Pedantically When Purpose Was Prison Decongestion Under Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Prisons (Mumbai Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Ayyaz Khan Zabaz Khan, a life convict under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Emergency Parole to Convict Under Amended Prison Rules During COVID-19 Epidemic. Convict Sentenced to Five Years Entitled to Favorable Consideration for Emergency Parole Under Rule 19(1)(C) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Mukesh s/o Ramshankar Shivhare, a convict serving rigorous imprisonment of five years in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave for Open Prison Convict on Personal Bond. Full Bench ruling in Dipak Sudhakar Wakalekar held that convicts in open prison can be released on furlough by dispensing with surety requirement under Rule 6 of the Prison Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Nitin Vasant Gurav, a life convict sentenced under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, was undergoing imprisonm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Double Punishment for Furlough Overstay — No Violation of Double Jeopardy as Remission Cut and Non-Reappointment as Convict Overseer Are Not Punishments Under Prison Rules.

The petitioner, Wilson Benjamin Castellino, a convict, was released on furlough on 19.11.2010 and was required to surrender on 4.12.2010. He failed to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict in Terrorist Crime Case Due to Non-Retrospective Application of Prison Rules. Sub Rule (13) of Rule 4 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Cannot Be Applied to Offences Committed Before Its Enactment on 23.02.2012.

The petitioner, Abdul Gani Ismail Turk, was convicted in the 1993 Mumbai Serial Bomb Blast case and sentenced to death by the TADA Court. The Supreme ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Petition Alleging Double Jeopardy in Prison Punishment and Transfer. Transfer of prisoner to Special Prison does not require prior court approval and forfeiture of remission for misconduct is not double jeopardy.

The petitioner, Niyaj Ahamad Abdul Jabbar, a convict lodged in Open Prison, Morshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court (Nagpu...