Search Results for "Application of Mind"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Review of State Actions in Contractual Disputes: Evolution and Current Scope. From Traditional Boundaries to Modern Oversight: Ensuring Fairness and Transparency in State Contractual Matters

The evolution of judicial review in India regarding state actions in contractual and tender disputes. Historically, such disputes were seen as private...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Writ Petition Allowed: Detention Order Quashed Due to Delays and Inconsistencies. Maharashtra Court Overturns Detention Under MPDA Act Citing Constitutional Violations and Non-Application of Mind by Detaining Authority

This petition challenges the detention order dated 03/04/2024 issued under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities (MPDA) Act, 1981, and it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes Politically Motivated Detention Order Against Opposition Politician. Subjective Satisfaction and Proper Evidence Lacking; Petitioner to Be Released Forthwith

The petitioner, Yogesh Udaram Gokhe, challenging a detention order passed by the respondents under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validity of Prosecution Sanctions: Pre-Trial Determination or Trial Issue? A comprehensive analysis of conflicting Apex Court judgments on the timing and significance of challenging prosecution sanctions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The legal debate on whether the validity of a prosecution sanction must be determined before trial or can be contested during the trial. It examines k...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Detention Order Quashed Due to Lack of Specificity in Grounds. Court emphasizes the need for clear and specific reasons for preventive detention to uphold constitutional safeguards.

The detention order of Rakesh Ramdas Jejurkar under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA). The or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Government’s Shift of Sports Complex to Rural Area Quashed. Court Orders CIDCO to Revert Land for Sports Complex Development, Emphasizing Public Interest and Transparency

The State Government's decision to relocate the Government Sports Complex from Navi Mumbai to a rural area for commercial exploitation has been critic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Stringent Provisions of MCOC Act, Denies Anticipatory Bail. Emphasizes Legislative Intent to Combat Organized Crime, Dismisses Reliance on SCST Act Precedents and Non-Binding Judgments

The judgment examines the applicability of anticipatory bail provisions under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOC Act) in comparison ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Commercial Appeals Dismissed: Court Upholds Single Judge's Decision Against Draft Supplemental Agreement" "Arbitral award set aside due to non-execution and unenforceability of central document, with significant procedural and substantive flaws identified."

Two concurrent Commercial Appeals (90 of 2020 and 91 of 2020) arising from an arbitral award dated February 14, 2017. The award was set aside by a Sin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Entertainment Duty on APSARA Award Function; Deletes Penalty. Petitioner's challenge to entertainment duty dismissed, penalty reduced due to legal interpretation issues.

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 28th September 2007, confirming an entertainment duty demand o...