Search Results for "Andhra Pradesh Forest Act"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 364 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Satyawan, who was allegedly abducted and killed by the appellants due to a debt dispute. The prosecution's case was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Guidelines on Arrest and Anticipatory Bail Under SC/ST Act. Directions Requiring Preliminary Enquiry and Approval for Arrest Quashed as Legislative Overreach, but Anticipatory Bail Direction Upheld.

The Union of India filed a review petition against the Supreme Court's judgment dated 20.3.2018 in Criminal Appeal No.416 of 2018, which had issued gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Entertainment Tax Exemption for IPL Matches — State Government's Policy Decision Not Interfered With. Policy Decision on Tax Exemption Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923.

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the propriety of the decision...