Search Results for "Separate legal entity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Separate legal entity"

1012 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1012 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Distribution Licensee in Standby Charges Dispute with Another Licensee — Standby Charges Fixed by Government Order and Principles of Agreement Held Binding. The court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's order that TPC could not recover standby charges beyond Rs.3.5 crores per month from BSES/REL for the 275 MVA facility, as per the Government of Maharashtra's order dated 19.1.1998 and the Principles of Agreement dated 30.1.1998.

2 May 2019

The case involves a dispute between Tata Power Company Ltd. (TPC), a distribution licensee supplying electricity to the entire city of Mumbai, and Ada...

High Court

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

9 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Legal Heir for Company's Central Excise Dues Without Proper Adjudication. Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed on Legal Representative Without Determining Liability Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

13 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Vandana Bidyut Chaterjee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging various notices and communi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

27 Apr 2012

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Final Order in Writ Petition Challenging Minutes of Committee of Creditors Meeting under IBC, 2016. Key Issue Involved Adequacy of Notice under Section 24 and Natural Justice in Approval of Resolution Plan.

22 Apr 2024

The writ petitioner, a suspended director of Associate Decor Limited (a company under corporate insolvency resolution process), challenged the minutes...

High Court

High Court Disposes Petitions Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Loan Default Cases — Financiers Sought Receiver and Injunction Against Borrower Company and Its Guarantor. Prima Facie Satisfaction of Outstanding Amounts Recorded and Interim Directions Including Status Quo Ordered Against Borrowers to Secure Claims of Rs.100 Crore and Rs.25 Crore.

21 Feb 2013

Two arbitration petitions were filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Tata Capital Financial Services Limited and L&T ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Partial Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Non-Signatory Principal Held Liable Based on Agency Relationship and Implied Consent.

3 Nov 2025

The appeals arose from three arbitral awards passed in disputes relating to the construction of mustard seed processing and storage silos in Rajasthan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Offences Under Section 132(1)(i) of CGST Act Are Bailable — Petitioner Entitled to Release on Bail. The court interpreted Section 132(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 to determine that offences punishable with imprisonment of five years or less are bailable, and arrest under Section 69 does not alter the bailable nature.

8 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Yogesh Jagdish Kanodia, was arrested on 30 December 2020 by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (Investigation-B), Mumbai, under S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

74 75 76 77 78

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)