Search Results for "third party administrator"

213 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 213 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Steel Coils Supply Dispute — Non-Conforming Goods Justify Rejection and Damages. The court upheld the arbitral award granting damages for breach of contract where goods did not meet specifications under the contract for sale of goods.

The petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 28th May 2013 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Ex-Judicial Officer Challenging Dismissal for Misconduct. Departmental inquiry found to be fair and charges proved, upholding dismissal under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979.

The petitioner, a former judicial officer, challenged his dismissal from service by an order dated 31 October 2006 passed by the Joint Secretary in th...